More On Bunkergate

image

As I’ve read dozens—perhaps a hundred—articles on Dustin Johnson’s the consensus seems to be settling in that the fault lies with player and caddy. Johnson admittedly didn’t pay much attention to the local rules sheet and if in doubt should have asked. I don’t disagree.

But I think the problem for Johnson was that he had no doubt. It never occurred to him that the bare area was a bunker.

I’ve attended two major championships—the Senior Championship at TPC Dearborn and the PGA Championship at Oakland Hills—as well as the Buick Open and the LPGA’s Jamie Farr. In all of those, the crowds had by the end of the weekend stomped out large bare spots along the sidelines that in sandy soil would have looked for all the world like the spot Johnson encountered.

Going strictly by the USGA’s definition of a bunker, I can see where there might be some confusion:

“A ‘bunker’ is a hazard consisting of a prepared area of ground, often a hollow, from which turf or soil has been removed and replaced with sand or the like.

With the crowds standing around, many obvious signs of bunker status likely were obscured. Further, crowds don’t stand in hazards. Still, there was that lip right in front of him …

A couple of other thoughts:

First, there are just too many bunkers on that course. It’s absurd that even the designer doesn’t have a handle on the number. I’ve seen several estimates, and several attempts by golf writers to enumerate them. None agree. So there’s no way to actually know whether that was a “prepared area of ground” or a random hole. The designer can’t look at a blueprint and say “indeed, I put a bunker there.”

Second, I wonder about the absence of the “blue dots.” According to the sheet that Johnson didn’t read, “where necessary, blue dots define the margin of the bunker.” I suppose they didn’t think it necessary here.

In the future, the PGA—and it will return to Whistling Straits for another PGA and the Ryder Cup in the next ten years—should define as a bunker anything within the ropes and as a waste area anything outside the ropes.

And finally, given the uncertainty about the nature of the bare spot, I think what the PGA should have proceeded under rule 1-4: If any point in dispute is not covered by the Rules, the decision should be made in accordance with equity.

There was doubt about the nature of the terrain. No one could prove that it actually was a “prepared areal,” and so Johnson should have been given the benefit of the doubt.

It’s to Johnson’s credit, however, that he didn’t argue any of these points. I actually think he’s learned a lot in missing out on two majors this year. If he’s half a man, he’ll be back in contention later, lessons learned.

Just a final musing … it occurred to me as I was writing the title of this post that it won’t be long before the bulk of the population no longer knows the origins of the -gate suffix.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Original Golf Blogger on Patreon!

7 thoughts on “More On Bunkergate”

  1. This never would have been an issue if Johnson hadn’t hit his drive 30 yards to the right of the fairway into the thick of the crowd!  It’s clear from Pebble and the 72nd at Whistling that his (in my opinion, awkward) swing does not hold up well under pressure.  Hence, these wayward drives which put him in precarious positions.  I can sympathize a bit, but if you want to be a major winner, you gotta have your head in the game for 72 holes.

    Reply
  2. The guy sitting on the right-hand side of the photo? Look at his hand and knee. It certainly looks like the lip of a bunker there.

    Anyway, I’ve noticed that a number of online commentators have declared WS a “cow pasture,” a joke, and other such terms. I’ve never played there (and given my game, likely never will), but I think we’re seeing unfair characterizations of the course. Granted, Pete Dye (the course architect) is a sadist, but still ….

    Reply
  3. Tough for DJ – but he has to know the rules before he steps on the first tee.  The PGA made it clear what was defined as a bunker for this event because they had the sense to recognize that there may be some grey area. 

    Regardless, DJ has the game and will contend in many more major championships.  I’d love to see him in Tiger in the last group in major.

    Reply
  4. Agree with you all. Had DJ read the rules sheet prior to stepping on the first tee, he would’ve known fans would be standing in bunkers.

    And let’s be honest. Not reading a one-page rules sheet for a professional golf tournament is pretty idiotic. (Most people do it before teeing off in a scramble at their local muni.)

    Jim Dauer
    FullForesome.com

    Reply
  5. I fully agree with all of that … very well put.

    regarding “If he’s half a man, he’ll be back in contention later, lessons learned.”

    I dont like his style … I dont like his swing and i think it’s a miracle he’s doing as well as he is … but just by beeing there after what happened at the US Open I’d say he has proved that he’s much more then “half a man”.

    Reply
  6. In a scramble, there are very few people that do it!  I have tried to keep it down to 5 sentances and still have found that if I don’t make the announcement specifically, that at least half the folks will miss an item.  Giving a simple sheet and making the announcement cuts it down to about 25% missing an instruction.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: