Van Sickle: “PGA Tour made a mistake riding the wave created by Tiger Woods”

Over at Golf.Com, Gary Van Sickle elaborates on a thought I’ve been writing about for some time: that the PGA Tour has made a huge mistake in mortgaging its future on Tiger Woods. Van Sickle says that as the PGA Tour faces tougher times in the next couple of years, it has only itself to blame:

You can blame it all on hard times if you want, but the problems began before the current economic crisis. The tour showed overconfidence — dare I say arrogance? — in the way that it rode the wave created by Tiger Woods. Some of the decisions made during this period took the tour in the wrong direction.

I remember a press briefing earlier this decade in which Commissioner Tim Finchem boasted about the growing number of golf fans and the game’s growing reach. As Woods became arguably the planet’s No. 1 celebrity, the game drew more exposure. That succeeded in creating more casual fans — more Tiger fans, not golf fans — but it didn’t seem to translate into more golfers, as figures on the number of players have remained flat. The Tiger-inspired audience that the Tour banked on is vast, but it’s more fickle than one made up of golfers who will watch every week, no matter who’s playing.

Tiger mania, Van Sickle says, led to some strategic miscalculations, including: too much television exposure, gigantic purses and made-for-television events. All of these only work for those events where Tiger is playing. The non-Tiger events, in the meantime, suffer. And it’s the long-time tournaments, not the Tiger extravaganzas that are the backbone of the professional sport.

By trying to make bigger, better and splashier television shows with Tiger, the tour has effectively undermined its core products — tournaments such as the John Deere Classic, the Buick, the Canadian Open and the Byron Nelson.

The PGA Tour has naturally divided into two kinds of tournaments, the ones Tiger plays and the ones he doesn’t. The focus on big events has exasperated the problem.

The Fall Series, meanwhile, has been left to fend for itself against almighty football. By heavily marketing the FedEx Cup and the Tour Championship, the tour has doomed the Fall Series to irrelevance. In addition, the Fall Series events don’t count for FedEx Cup points, and winners don’t get Masters invites. Unless the tour wants these events to go away, that should change.

The European Tour doesn’t limit its season to a calendar year. Its 2009 season has already started. The PGA Tour should follow suit. The Fall Series should be the start of the next season. The money should count, FedEx Cup points should be awarded and winners should get the same perks as winners of other tournaments.

The PGA Tour appears to be shrinking. That matters to the rank-and-file players, if not to those who already have their millions. Even with changes, the Fall Series may ultimately fall. The big question is, what else on the PGA Tour would go with it?

I’ll go a step futher than Van Sickle, however. It has never made sense to me that the Tour would rely so much on a player who ultimately cares about nothing but himself. Everything Tiger does is about Tiger. Even his charity work is designed to elevate the Tiger brand. He doesn’t play in charity events. He sponsors them, and makes sure his name is at the top.

When Tiger quits the Tour to go independent—and it’s WHEN, not IF—the PGA Tour is screwed. Their only hope is to do a strategic restructuring with a plan that doesn’t include Tiger Woods.

 

Liked it? Take a second to support emtwo on Patreon!

3 thoughts on “Van Sickle: “PGA Tour made a mistake riding the wave created by Tiger Woods””

  1. Wanna bet Van Sickle gets hate mail over this…readers calling him racist?

    Easy solution to this problem will present itself with the next star. The fringe fanatic sports fans who dote on the superstar of the moment will come and go.

    But, we will always have the golf fan base.

    Reply
  2. I think that what Van Sickle is hinting at—and I’ll say outright—is that the Tiger obsession is hurting the golf fan base. Those “little” tournaments that Tiger and the Tour are snubbing—the John Deere, etc.—are precisely the ones that have built and developed the solid fan base over the years.

    The Tour won’t impose a 1-in-4 rule for fear of losing Tiger, but they’re going to lose him anyway.

    Reply
  3. I’ve been saying that the constant sucking up to Tiger by the media and the tour and sponsors, etc is only hurting golf since about 1999-2000 when I went on my 5 year boycott of golf watching.

    It’s really a no-brainer – if everyone at my work depended on me to do everything and I up and leave, then my employer is screwed.  Other parts of the private sector get this and they go the job-sharing route.  But when big money is involved and getting rich quick, people tend to forget the principles of sound business management.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: